BSC01Customer satisfaction that the quality of streets/public places is improvingAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BSC01Customer satisfaction that the quality of streets/public places is improvingAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.00Up is Good BSC01Customer satisfaction that the quality of streets/public places is improvingAnnualFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Good BSC01Customer satisfaction that the quality of streets/public places is improvingAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BSC01Customer satisfaction that the quality of streets/public places is improvingAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BSC02Customer satisfaction on how we work to improve green spacesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BSC02Customer satisfaction on how we work to improve green spacesAnnualFinancial Year2012/201360.00Up is Good BSC02Customer satisfaction on how we work to improve green spacesAnnualFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good BSC02Customer satisfaction on how we work to improve green spacesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BSC02Customer satisfaction on how we work to improve green spacesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/ANeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2012/201370.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCNeutral BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS236% of residents who volunteer at least once per week (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS236% of residents who volunteer at least once per week (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.00Up is Good BYS236% of residents who volunteer at least once per week (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201421.00Up is Good BYS236% of residents who volunteer at least once per week (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS236% of residents who volunteer at least once per week (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012N/AUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.8491.90NC89.84NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9491.23NC89.94NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201988.6188.09NC88.61NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202084.4788.45NC84.47NCUp is Good TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20176.185.60NC6.18NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.296.80NC6.29NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20198.027.80NC8.02NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.128.81NC10.12NCUp is Bad TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201363.00Up is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.5465.60NC65.54NCUp is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.1364.76NC62.13NCUp is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201957.3360.29NC57.33NCUp is Good TAP02a% of panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.0055.56NC51.00NCUp is Good TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201319.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201429.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201720.3220.80NC20.32NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.8020.26NC22.80NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.1023.05NC22.10NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.6521.62NC19.65NCUp is Bad TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201442.00Up is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201745.3347.20NC45.33NCUp is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201845.4548.57NC45.45NCUp is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201943.1442.68NC43.14NCUp is Good TAP03a% of panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.0743.00NC38.07NCUp is Good TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201724.0622.20NC24.06NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.8921.10NC23.89NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.2123.51NC17.21NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.7619.00NC19.76NCUp is Bad TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201392.00Up is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201489.00Up is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201792.2091.90NC92.20NCUp is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201891.7092.65NC91.70NCUp is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.6391.51NC89.63NCUp is Good TAP04a% of panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5387.07NC87.53NCUp is Good TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20146.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.403.10NC4.40NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20185.534.01NC5.53NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.704.46NC6.70NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.878.28NC5.87NCUp is Bad TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201440.00Up is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201760.8161.70NC60.81NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201850.3362.81NC50.33NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201951.3150.64NC51.31NCUp is Good TAP05a% of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.5053.29NC51.50NCUp is Good TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201411.00Up is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.477.00NC7.47NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201810.687.35NC10.68NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.2110.04NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.258.03NC8.25NCUp is Bad TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201370.00Up is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201474.00Up is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.2088.80NC89.20NCUp is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201886.0589.53NC86.05NCUp is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201991.9288.61NC91.92NCUp is Good TAP06a% of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.9488.73NC87.94NCUp is Good TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201330.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201710.4010.80NC10.40NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201813.099.58NC13.09NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.219.92NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.5610.45NC11.56NCUp is Bad TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201774.7075.20NC74.70NCUp is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201875.2778.44NC75.27NCUp is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201980.2276.41NC80.22NCUp is Good TAP07a% of panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202077.7878.06NC77.78NCUp is Good TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201446.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.1024.40NC25.10NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.0319.11NC23.03NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.3321.71NC19.33NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202021.7120.46NC21.71NCUp is Bad TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201770.1169.50NC70.11NCUp is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.8475.24NC72.84NCUp is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201968.4775.06NC68.47NCUp is Good TAP08a% of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202061.8862.17NC61.88NCUp is Good TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20138.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.449.40NC9.44NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.856.55NC11.85NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.918.86NC6.91NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.919.20NC8.91NCUp is Bad TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.4664.00NC65.46NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8170.51NC64.81NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201972.5266.11NC72.52NCUp is Good TAP09a% of panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7471.52NC74.74NCUp is Good TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201726.1027.30NC26.10NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.2523.06NC27.25NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.4025.89NC19.40NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.1121.41NC17.11NCUp is Bad TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201780.7579.60NC80.75NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201879.7079.20NC79.70NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201977.7881.68NC77.78NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202075.4376.39NC75.43NCUp is Good TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.965.90NC4.96NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20184.496.64NC4.49NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.416.74NC7.41NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209.688.62NC9.68NCUp is Bad TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.6529.00NC25.65NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201826.8728.41NC26.87NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201928.9525.68NC28.95NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202029.0627.37NC29.06NCUp is Good TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201342.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201739.9639.50NC39.96NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201840.9437.22NC40.94NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201941.0143.16NC41.01NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202037.9339.30NC37.93NCUp is Bad TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201790.8588.20NC90.85NCUp is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9190.27NC89.91NCUp is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201992.2489.66NC92.24NCUp is Good TAP12a% of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202090.5991.58NC90.59NCUp is Good TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201414.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.3610.50NC7.36NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20188.377.74NC8.37NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.218.02NC6.21NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.176.74NC8.17NCUp is Bad TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.00Up is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201764.3064.80NC64.30NCUp is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201866.2266.44NC66.22NCUp is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201964.7267.83NC64.72NCUp is Good TAP13a% of Talkabout panel who give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202067.1764.98NC67.17NCUp is Good TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201354.00Up is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201732.6632.50NC32.66NCUp is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201831.3230.65NC31.32NCUp is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201930.7930.00NC30.79NCUp is Bad TAP13b% of Talkabout panel who do not give unpaid help to any group, club or organisationQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202030.5831.86NC30.58NCUp is Bad TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201386.00Neutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201481.00Neutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNeutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201779.9181.60NC79.91NCNeutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201878.2477.84NC78.24NCNeutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201978.0779.05NC78.07NCNeutral TAP14a% of panel who work inside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202079.8977.48NC79.89NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201313.00Neutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201419.00Neutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201720.0918.40NC20.09NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201821.7622.16NC21.76NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201921.9320.95NC21.93NCNeutral TAP14b% of panel who work outside York areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202020.1122.52NC20.11NCNeutral TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201364.00Up is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201460.00Up is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201772.3470.70NC72.34NCUp is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201871.2868.13NC71.28NCUp is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201954.2373.85NC54.23NCUp is Good TAP15a% of panel who agree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202050.6853.74NC50.68NCUp is Good TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201320.00Up is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.00Up is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.6021.40NC16.60NCUp is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201819.1519.23NC19.15NCUp is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201915.0016.06NC15.00NCUp is Bad TAP15b% of panel who disagree their skills and qualifications are suited to jobs available in YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202014.8613.51NC14.86NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201735.8637.10NC35.86NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201847.5341.48NC47.53NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.9639.59NC29.96NCUp is Bad TAP16a% of panel who agree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.6830.61NC27.68NCUp is Bad TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201333.00Up is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201751.5248.00NC51.52NCUp is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201841.9846.59NC41.98NCUp is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.5845.69NC31.58NCUp is Good TAP16b% of panel who disagree that to develop their career need to commute out of YorkQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.6828.48NC27.68NCUp is Good TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201318.00Up is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.00Up is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201719.2917.40NC19.29NCUp is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.8419.02NC22.84NCUp is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201913.1119.68NC13.11NCUp is Bad TAP17a% of panel who agree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.9415.60NC10.94NCUp is Bad TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201351.00Up is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.5168.30NC67.51NCUp is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.4367.48NC65.43NCUp is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201945.9068.09NC45.90NCUp is Good TAP17b% of panel who disagree that to continue working in York will have to retrainQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202041.1341.90NC41.13NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.0435.20NC41.04NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201840.9741.74NC40.97NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201940.4038.17NC40.40NCUp is Good TAP18a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.6137.37NC38.61NCUp is Good TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201338.00Up is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201728.0831.70NC28.08NCUp is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201830.8427.29NC30.84NCUp is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.5834.33NC29.58NCUp is Bad TAP18b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are helping to create jobs in the cityQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202034.6534.45NC34.65NCUp is Bad TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201335.00Up is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201430.00Up is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201743.5339.60NC43.53NCUp is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201839.8244.58NC39.82NCUp is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201943.8938.41NC43.89NCUp is Good TAP19a% of panel who agree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.1942.41NC38.19NCUp is Good TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201335.00Up is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.00Up is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201728.7931.00NC28.79NCUp is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201833.9426.89NC33.94NCUp is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201930.7736.87NC30.77NCUp is Bad TAP19b% of panel who disagree the council and its partners are supporting economic growthQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202034.9232.91NC34.92NCUp is Bad TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0377.00NC77.03NCUp is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201870.5174.72NC70.51NCUp is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201977.1973.21NC77.19NCUp is Good TAP20a% of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202079.7573.35NC79.75NCUp is Good TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201311.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.8011.50NC12.80NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201817.5214.41NC17.52NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201910.3114.14NC10.31NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.0012.60NC10.00NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20133.00Up is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20144.00Up is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20175.423.59NC5.42NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20183.854.71NC3.85NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20193.744.23NC3.74NCUp is Bad TAP21a% of panel who think that hate crime is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.214.39NC5.21NCUp is Bad TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201389.00Up is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201489.00Up is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201787.1589.22NC87.15NCUp is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201883.3086.55NC83.30NCUp is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.7684.78NC81.76NCUp is Good TAP21b% of panel who think that hate crime is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202077.6782.43NC77.67NCUp is Good TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20138.00Up is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201416.00Up is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201710.8711.70NC10.87NCUp is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.858.99NC9.85NCUp is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201912.3110.81NC12.31NCUp is Bad TAP22a% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.5812.60NC11.58NCUp is Bad TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201382.00Up is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201482.00Up is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201787.3286.81NC87.32NCUp is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201887.7988.31NC87.79NCUp is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.2787.29NC85.27NCUp is Good TAP22b% of panel who think that noisy neighbours or loud parties are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202083.5084.71NC83.50NCUp is Good TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201316.00Up is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.00Up is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5318.22NC18.53NCUp is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201820.2215.47NC20.22NCUp is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201916.5617.80NC16.56NCUp is Bad TAP23a% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.5320.46NC17.53NCUp is Bad TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201372.00Up is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201478.00Up is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201779.2380.30NC79.23NCUp is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201876.3481.61NC76.34NCUp is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201979.2579.87NC79.25NCUp is Good TAP23b% of panel who think that people hanging around on the streets is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202077.5376.41NC77.53NCUp is Good TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201323.00Up is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201433.00Up is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.7938.40NC38.79NCUp is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201839.2740.49NC39.27NCUp is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201939.4743.76NC39.47NCUp is Bad TAP24a% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202042.7543.98NC42.75NCUp is Bad TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201365.00Up is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201466.00Up is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201761.0161.18NC61.01NCUp is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201860.0959.51NC60.09NCUp is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201960.0956.03NC60.09NCUp is Good TAP24b% of panel who think that rubbish or litter lying around is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202056.0255.81NC56.02NCUp is Good TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201315.00Up is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201719.4017.58NC19.40NCUp is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201816.0316.78NC16.03NCUp is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201916.8118.53NC16.81NCUp is Bad TAP25a% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202018.4719.88NC18.47NCUp is Bad TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201482.00Up is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.4080.93NC77.40NCUp is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201879.9180.76NC79.91NCUp is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201978.5476.63NC78.54NCUp is Good TAP25b% of panel who think that vandalism, graffiti and other deliberate damage to property or vehicles is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202075.6275.57NC75.62NCUp is Good TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201313.00Up is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201719.1121.29NC19.11NCUp is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201817.2016.11NC17.20NCUp is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201918.3221.56NC18.32NCUp is Bad TAP26a% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202022.9621.67NC22.96NCUp is Bad TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.00Up is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201762.3760.65NC62.37NCUp is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201857.4256.15NC57.42NCUp is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201956.0754.33NC56.07NCUp is Good TAP26b% of panel who think that people using or dealing drugs is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.1154.58NC51.11NCUp is Good TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201318.00Up is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201425.00Up is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201728.2829.18NC28.28NCUp is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201829.5325.50NC29.53NCUp is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.7429.81NC29.74NCUp is Bad TAP27a% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202032.9235.97NC32.92NCUp is Bad TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201371.00Up is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201472.00Up is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201766.8766.81NC66.87NCUp is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8768.68NC64.87NCUp is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201963.4464.69NC63.44NCUp is Good TAP27b% of panel who think that people being drunk or rowdy in public places is not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202060.4459.67NC60.44NCUp is Good TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20131.00Up is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.00Up is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.021.93NC2.02NCUp is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.651.81NC0.65NCUp is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.431.90NC2.43NCUp is Bad TAP28a% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.462.51NC2.46NCUp is Bad TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201394.00Up is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201493.00Up is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.9290.13NC89.92NCUp is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201890.4887.58NC90.48NCUp is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.6587.55NC85.65NCUp is Good TAP28b% of panel who think that abandoned or burnt out cars are not a problem in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202085.4787.89NC85.47NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201333.00Up is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201427.00Up is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201729.7830.70NC29.78NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201829.6530.13NC29.65NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201927.9025.74NC27.90NCUp is Good TAP29a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202026.1225.21NC26.12NCUp is Good TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201324.00Up is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201429.00Up is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.8339.20NC38.83NCUp is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201845.6740.63NC45.67NCUp is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201956.0349.58NC56.03NCUp is Bad TAP29b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at reducing air pollutionQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.2058.82NC59.20NCUp is Bad TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201360.00Up is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201742.8047.80NC42.80NCUp is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201837.0948.42NC37.09NCUp is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201938.0345.22NC38.03NCUp is Good TAP30a% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202042.1437.92NC42.14NCUp is Good TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201315.00Up is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201740.7739.50NC40.77NCUp is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201845.1236.04NC45.12NCUp is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.2241.19NC49.22NCUp is Bad TAP30b% of Talkabout panel who think that the council are not doing well at improving green spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202044.1451.06NC44.14NCUp is Bad TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201381.00Up is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201470.00Up is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.4177.40NC76.41NCUp is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201869.4876.40NC69.48NCUp is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201976.6774.84NC76.67NCUp is Good TAP31a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7574.58NC74.75NCUp is Good TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20137.00Up is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201416.00Up is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201715.3214.00NC15.32NCUp is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201821.0015.96NC21.00NCUp is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201916.4417.55NC16.44NCUp is Bad TAP31b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well conserving York's heritageQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.7517.44NC17.75NCUp is Bad TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201363.00Up is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201747.4045.30NC47.40NCUp is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201838.2643.05NC38.26NCUp is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201933.7035.59NC33.70NCUp is Good TAP32a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202035.2433.47NC35.24NCUp is Good TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201436.00Up is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.0048.50NC44.00NCUp is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201852.6148.65NC52.61NCUp is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.9157.84NC59.91NCUp is Bad TAP32b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well at improving the quality of streets/public spacesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202058.8160.25NC58.81NCUp is Bad TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201365.00Up is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201751.5151.70NC51.51NCUp is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201852.9047.99NC52.90NCUp is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201924.8942.83NC24.89NCUp is Good TAP33a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202037.4733.68NC37.47NCUp is Good TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201321.00Up is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201437.00Up is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201739.8441.10NC39.84NCUp is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201839.3544.42NC39.35NCUp is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201951.3548.95NC51.35NCUp is Bad TAP33b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce amount of household wasteQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202053.1057.38NC53.10NCUp is Bad TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201334.00Up is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201428.00Up is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.6825.60NC27.68NCUp is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201828.7323.94NC28.73NCUp is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201940.5822.03NC40.58NCUp is Good TAP34a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202022.6920.55NC22.69NCUp is Good TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201436.00Up is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201746.0645.10NC46.06NCUp is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201844.9246.98NC44.92NCUp is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201951.0053.60NC51.00NCUp is Bad TAP34b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well helping to reduce carbon footprintQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202055.6156.81NC55.61NCUp is Bad TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201315.00Up is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201412.00Up is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.6714.30NC16.67NCUp is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.3714.86NC15.37NCUp is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201914.7015.01NC14.70NCUp is Good TAP35a% of panel who think that the council and partners are doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202013.7215.13NC13.72NCUp is Good TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201335.00Up is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201752.0151.70NC52.01NCUp is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201853.4651.13NC53.46NCUp is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201955.4653.07NC55.46NCUp is Bad TAP35b% of panel who think that the council and partners are not doing well encouraging the use of low emission vehiclesQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.8559.87NC59.85NCUp is Bad TAP36a% of the panel who speak positively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good TAP36a% of the panel who speak positively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201835.64NCNC35.64NCUp is Good TAP36a% of the panel who speak positively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.6632.91NC31.66NCUp is Good TAP36a% of the panel who speak positively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202031.4233.27NC31.42NCUp is Good TAP36b% of the panel who speak negatively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad TAP36b% of the panel who speak negatively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201829.37NCNC29.37NCUp is Bad TAP36b% of the panel who speak negatively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201928.3831.85NC28.38NCUp is Bad TAP36b% of the panel who speak negatively about the councilQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202026.6827.79NC26.68NCUp is Bad TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201285.30Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201381.80Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201482.25Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201581.2781.27Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201684.5684.56Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.5680.56Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2017/201878.7278.72Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201979.86Up is Good TSS01% of tenants satisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202079.20Up is Good TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.20Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.40Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.01Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201514.4314.43Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.3013.30Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.7911.79Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.0215.02Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201912.66Up is Bad TSS01a% of tenants dissatisfied with the way their landlord deals with repairs and maintenance generallyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202013.20Up is Bad TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2011/201241.10Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.79Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8932.89Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2015/201643.9843.98Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2016/201741.6241.62Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2017/201837.1937.19Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.01Up is Good TSS08B% of tenants who say car parking is not a problem in their neighbourhoodAnnualFinancial Year2019/202038.09Up is Good