102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201224.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201420.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201332.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.00Up is Bad 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013100.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201498.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201588.0060.0085.0086.0088.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201690.0089.0090.0091.0090.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201783.0070.0033.0086.0070.0080.00100.0050.0081.00100.0023.0029.0033.0073.00100.0088.0083.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201888.0075.0020.0080.0067.0080.0090.0075.0082.0079.00100.00100.0088.00100.0086.0080.0087.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201995.0081.0071.0055.0069.0075.0095.0063.0081.0077.0093.0033.0080.0083.00100.00100.0095.00Up is Good 103b% of final Education, Health & Care Plans issued within statutory time limits, including exceptions (definition changed Sept 2014)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202086.0078.0092.00100.0093.0087.0088.00100.0090.0094.0082.0063.0083.0075.0080.0067.0071.00Up is Good 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/2012769.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013399.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014472.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015388.00502.00491.00420.00388.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016477.00393.00438.00471.00477.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017380.00462.56404.73353.33385.46Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018360.00419.00425.00451.00360.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019288.00390.00332.00307.00288.00Up is Bad 111First time entrants to the Youth Justice System aged 10-17 (per 100,000 10-17 year olds in York) - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020219.40238.20257.00263.30219.40Up is Bad 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201294.70Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013100.00100.00Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201494.7094.70Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201594.9094.90Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201689.5089.50Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201788.0088.00Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201882.0082.00Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201977.0075.3175.6176.1976.1975.9074.3972.2972.2972.6274.0770.5970.5969.7768.6768.7568.75Up is Good 147% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in suitable accommodation - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202095.0083.3385.3785.8885.8885.7185.3785.3785.3786.5986.5989.8789.8789.8792.4195.0095.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201273.70Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201371.0071.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201464.0064.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201556.0056.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201667.0067.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201774.0074.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201865.0065.00Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201956.0054.3253.6653.5753.5754.2251.2249.4049.4052.3853.0952.9452.9452.3351.8151.2551.25Up is Good 148% of care leavers aged 19-21 (19 before 2014/15) in employment, education or training - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202063.7558.9759.7657.6557.6557.1457.3258.5458.5459.7659.7659.4959.4959.4960.7663.7563.75Up is Good 45% of young people ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET (New definition from 2013/14 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201223.00Up is Bad 45% of young people ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET (New definition from 2013/14 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201327.00Up is Bad 45% of young people ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET (New definition from 2013/14 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201428.00Up is Bad 45% of young people ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET (New definition from 2013/14 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201519.5022.9020.3020.7019.50Up is Bad 45% of young people ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET (New definition from 2013/14 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201626.2031.6027.0024.6026.20Up is Bad 45a% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad 45a% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad 45b% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201526.8027.6025.9028.8026.80Up is Bad 45b% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised order who are NEET - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201639.3050.0030.8036.4039.30Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201532.40Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201635.60Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201720.4011.1013.0020.0020.40Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201826.8017.6014.3019.4026.80Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.509.1025.0028.6029.50Up is Bad 45c% of young people ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202018.0018.2025.0017.9018.00Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201511.50Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.00Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.700.000.000.006.70Up is Bad 45d% of 10-16 year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET - (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.000.000.000.0017.00Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201543.80Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201645.70Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.8014.3016.7026.9027.80Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201839.3033.3030.0028.6039.30Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201941.4020.0046.2047.6041.40Up is Bad 45e% of 16+ year olds ending their YOT supervised court order who are NEET (NEW definition 2016/17 - cumulative) - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202018.0040.0034.8033.3018.00Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121.70Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20133.60Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20145.70Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20159.5011.6011.408.509.50Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20162.803.902.403.802.80Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20172.738.334.552.332.337.816.945.685.685.104.464.074.073.523.272.732.73Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20184.330.007.896.126.124.354.056.546.545.985.384.614.615.454.954.334.33Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20190.880.002.501.891.891.100.990.880.881.501.321.191.191.070.990.880.88Up is Bad 64% of children ceasing to be subject to a Child Protection Plan who had been the subject of a CPP continuously for two years or longer - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.420.000.007.277.275.264.123.673.673.453.623.113.112.812.424.424.42Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201217.00Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201321.20Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201410.90Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201512.2017.6013.3013.6012.20Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201625.7025.0030.7026.2025.70Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201728.3820.0034.4822.4522.4530.2628.5725.2625.2633.6033.3330.5630.5628.6429.0528.3828.38Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201822.0641.6735.7141.3841.3847.2238.0036.4936.4933.6727.0526.8526.8523.8122.8722.0622.06Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201933.0331.2528.2135.3835.3841.7637.5038.7638.7637.5036.7635.5735.5734.3333.4933.0333.03Up is Bad 65% of children becoming subject to a Child Protection Plan for a second or subsequent time - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202026.0529.7328.3028.3828.3831.4327.2725.0025.0024.5123.9823.0523.0526.1826.6326.0526.05Up is Bad 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201162.10Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201263.00Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201367.00Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.00Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201462.30Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.70Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.20Up is Good 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.9036.90Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201231.6031.60Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.3023.30Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201417.1017.10Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.2019.20Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.2014.20Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201725.1025.10Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.3031.30Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20094.74Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.96Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.04Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.73Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20133.82Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.74Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.92Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.79Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172.50Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20183.40Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.80Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312.87Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.79Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.27Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.32Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.30Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201812.50Up is Bad CHP18Children with one or more decayed, missing or filled teethFive YearsFinancial Year2011/201224.72Up is Bad CHP18Children with one or more decayed, missing or filled teethFive YearsFinancial Year2014/201516.40Up is Bad CHP18Children with one or more decayed, missing or filled teethFive YearsFinancial Year2015/2016N/AUp is Bad CHP18Children with one or more decayed, missing or filled teethFive YearsFinancial Year2016/201715.90Up is Bad CHP18Children with one or more decayed, missing or filled teethFive YearsFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20110.95Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121.03Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.25Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.29Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.72Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.90Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.80Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.90Up is Bad CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.66Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.36Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.99Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201469.00Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015N/ANeutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.10Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCNeutral CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011390.50Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012414.50Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013447.60Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014416.90Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015398.70Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016421.40Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017455.90Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018465.90Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019465.90Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012118.00Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013159.96Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014146.62Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015124.94Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016101.62Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017139.70Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018150.20Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201145.74Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201261.20Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013105.36Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014101.84Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015103.76Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016179.80Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017109.00Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201895.80Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012338.81Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013429.85Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014401.21Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015552.96Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016675.20Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017633.50Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018539.90Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019189.90Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200912.80Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.30Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201112.90Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.50Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.10Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.60Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.60Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.70Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201710.00Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad CJGE13Proportion of Children in Child Poverty (HMRC)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.38Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.74Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.38Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.35Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad CJGE13APercentage of Children (aged 0- 15) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.64Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.03Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.75Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.74Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad CJGE13BPercentage of Children (aged 0- 18) living in Out-of-work Benefit Claimant HouseholdsAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.30Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2010/20113.70Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.60Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2012/20134.90Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2013/20144.20Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.70Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.00Up is Bad CJGE21% of young people not in education, employment or trainingAnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.70Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/20092.18Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/20102.20Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112.15Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/20121.60Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.19Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.25Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20152.992.001.40Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.69Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.60Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Bad CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201295.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201396.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201495.78Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201595.1595.7094.30NC96.30Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201696.0095.8093.6094.6095.10Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201796.3076.4095.6096.4095.50Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201895.60Up is Good CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201552.0018.0020.0010.004.00Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201622.006.007.008.001.00Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.0011.006.008.0018.00Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015368.70Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016342.90Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.55Up is Bad CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121780.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131016.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20142846.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20153899.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20163679.00298.00586.00969.00969.001326.001670.001993.001993.002327.002671.002974.002974.003317.003592.003679.003679.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20174446.00325.00692.001074.001074.001415.001712.002080.002080.002426.002802.003153.003153.003605.003971.004446.004446.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20185270.00319.00841.001288.001288.001760.002176.002680.002680.003143.003587.003939.003939.004409.004813.005270.005270.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20195523.00389.00868.001301.001301.001826.002247.002732.002732.003275.003735.004109.004109.004546.005007.005523.005523.00Neutral CSC01Number of Contacts to Children's Services - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20207777.00549.001139.001766.001766.002459.002990.003601.003601.004313.004986.005705.005705.006469.007129.007777.007777.00Neutral CSS7% of adopted children who wait <14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201562.2259.0033.0067.5062.22Up is Good CSS7% of adopted children who wait <14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201664.0064.0066.0063.0064.00Up is Good CSS7% of adopted children who wait <14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.0062.0063.0067.0067.00Up is Good CSS7% of adopted children who wait <14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201879.0073.0076.0077.0080.0073.0075.0079.00Up is Good CSS7% of adopted children who wait <14 mths from entering care to moving in with adoptive family (16 mths in 2015, 18 mths in 2014, 20 mths in 2013) - (Rolling 3 years)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.0078.0082.0085.0085.00Up is Good CYP10-4Number of Troubled Families turned around - (New 2014/2015)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015306.00N/A235.00282.00306.00Up is Good CYP10-4Number of Troubled Families turned around - (New 2014/2015)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016315.00Up is Good CYP10-5Troubled Families: Number of identified families that are being/have been worked withQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015315.00315.00315.00315.00315.00Up is Good CYP10-5Troubled Families: Number of identified families that are being/have been worked withQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016315.00Up is Good CYP10-6Troubled Families: Number of families “turned around” for Education and Crime/ASB issuesQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015266.00N/A200.00243.00266.00Up is Good CYP10-6Troubled Families: Number of families “turned around” for Education and Crime/ASB issuesQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016271.00Up is Good CYP10-7Troubled Families: Number of families “turned around” for EmploymentQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201540.00N/A35.0039.0040.00Up is Good CYP10-7Troubled Families: Number of families “turned around” for EmploymentQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201644.00Up is Good CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201225.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201422.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201525.0022.0024.0026.0025.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201619.0023.0019.0019.0019.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC19.0019.0019.00NCUp is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201816.0018.0018.0018.0018.0020.0011.0014.0014.0014.0014.0015.0015.0016.0016.0016.0016.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201912.0013.0013.0013.0013.0012.0012.009.009.0011.0011.0011.0011.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Up is Bad CYPL1Total number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-19 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202019.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0017.0017.0017.0017.0018.0018.0019.0019.00Up is Bad CYPL1aTotal number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-25 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201730.0032.0032.00Up is Bad CYPL1aTotal number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-25 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201816.0018.0018.0018.0018.0020.0011.0014.0014.0014.0014.0015.0015.0016.0016.0016.0016.00Up is Bad CYPL1aTotal number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-25 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201927.0027.0027.0027.0027.0027.0027.0025.0025.0026.0026.0026.0026.0027.0027.0027.0027.00Up is Bad CYPL1aTotal number of LA-funded out-City placements (0-25 years) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202029.0031.0031.0031.0031.0027.0027.0027.0027.0028.0028.0028.0028.0028.0028.0029.0029.00Up is Bad CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012255.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013201.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014228.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015243.0067.0033.0077.0066.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016171.0045.0036.0055.0035.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCNeutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018194.0013.0024.0027.0064.0012.0010.009.0031.0018.0022.0019.0059.0019.008.0013.0040.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019260.0012.0027.0024.0063.0015.0016.0017.0048.0011.0035.0024.0070.0022.0028.0029.0079.00Neutral CYPL2cNumber of Early Help Assessments initiatedMonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020245.0015.0021.0022.0058.0018.0014.0014.0046.0039.0030.0018.0087.0027.0017.0010.0054.00Neutral CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010481262.00Up is Bad CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011513723.00Up is Bad CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012437943.00Up is Bad CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013431041.00Up is Bad CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014881882.00Up is Bad CYPL30Total Cost of out of authority placementsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20151179013.00Up is Bad EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201273.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201368.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201460.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201553.0062.0060.0059.0053.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201653.0055.0056.0052.0053.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201755.0051.0051.0051.0051.0053.0053.0055.0055.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201853.0056.0055.0054.0054.0054.0052.0052.0052.0050.0053.0052.0052.0052.0051.0053.0053.00Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201956.2252.9752.4355.9555.9555.1455.6855.6855.6855.4155.4155.6855.6855.1457.0356.2256.22Neutral EFL1Children in care per 10k, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202070.8157.5758.3860.5460.5459.7362.4363.5163.5164.0564.5964.8664.8665.4169.1970.8170.81Neutral EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200919265.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201020185.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201119689.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201219804.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201321277.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201420588.00Up is Bad EFL10Average cost per child in care (£)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201524939.00Up is Bad EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012256.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013243.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014222.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015193.00222.00217.00211.00193.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016191.00199.00203.00188.00191.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017205.00190.00190.00190.00190.00196.00196.00204.00204.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018197.00206.00204.00200.00200.00201.00193.00191.00191.00185.00197.00193.00193.00192.00190.00197.00197.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019208.00196.00194.00207.00207.00204.00206.00206.00206.00205.00205.00206.00206.00204.00211.00208.00208.00Neutral EFL1aNumber of children in care, excluding Short Breaks - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020262.00213.00216.00224.00224.00221.00231.00235.00235.00237.00239.00240.00240.00242.00256.00262.00262.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201247.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201338.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201435.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201534.0032.0033.0032.0034.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201637.0034.0037.0040.0037.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201746.0033.0033.0039.0039.0053.0053.0046.0046.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201845.0045.0040.0041.0041.0037.0040.0037.0037.0041.0044.0045.0045.0047.0048.0045.0045.00Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201943.5143.7844.8648.3848.3845.1445.9549.1949.1952.4354.5952.1652.1648.9246.7643.5143.51Neutral EFL2Children subject to a Child Protection Plan per 10k - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202064.5946.4945.1446.4946.4949.1956.7661.6261.6265.1463.7863.5163.5167.5772.7064.5964.59Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012162.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013137.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014125.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015124.00116.00120.00118.00124.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016135.00124.00133.00144.00135.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017171.00122.00122.00143.00143.00199.00199.00171.00171.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018167.00166.00147.00151.00151.00138.00147.00138.00138.00153.00163.00168.00168.00175.00177.00167.00167.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019161.00162.00166.00179.00179.00167.00170.00182.00182.00194.00202.00193.00193.00181.00173.00161.00161.00Neutral EFL2aNumber of children subject to a Child Protection Plan - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020239.00172.00167.00172.00172.00182.00210.00228.00228.00241.00236.00235.00235.00250.00269.00239.00239.00Neutral EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20141922.001344.001532.001814.001922.00Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20151416.001756.001640.001532.001416.00Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161366.001438.00Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20141734.001200.001508.001674.001734.00Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20151495.001793.001623.001504.001495.00Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161453.001518.00Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018457.00Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.49Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.50Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201570.00Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201674.10Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.30Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201874.80Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.60Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201265.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201366.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201484.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201584.0084.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201889.0087.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019100.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020100.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201478.0078.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201570.0070.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201672.0072.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.50Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201878.0074.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973.50Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202075.50Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.80Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.30Up is Good HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/2009113.00156.00143.00135.00113.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201039.0085.0062.0041.0039.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201151.0052.0039.0056.0051.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201252.0049.0047.0042.0052.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201347.0048.0057.0054.0047.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201445.0044.0048.0040.0045.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201541.0032.0037.0036.0041.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.0047.0047.0040.0030.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201733.0027.0036.0028.0033.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.0034.0036.0031.0027.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201924.0027.0037.0035.0024.00Up is Bad HOU102Number of homeless households with dependent children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202022.0021.0022.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201275.0082.0066.0072.0075.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201397.0077.0098.0075.0097.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201468.0087.0077.0062.0068.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201569.0058.0056.0065.0069.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201646.0084.0082.0077.0046.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201758.0048.0063.0065.0058.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.0064.0062.0055.0043.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201942.0043.0063.0061.0042.00Up is Bad HOU102aNumber of children in temporary accommodation - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.0031.0034.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200945.0013.0021.0035.0045.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201029.008.0016.0022.0029.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201140.0012.0026.0032.0040.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201222.003.0014.0020.0022.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.001.001.002.002.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20141.000.001.001.001.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20151.000.001.001.001.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad HOU106Number of 16-17 year olds accepted as homeless - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20190.00Up is Bad HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201674.4023.3562.6459.0074.40Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201778.3074.3270.1473.7078.30Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201885.6184.2085.4084.7085.61Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.9087.0088.2088.7085.90Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.3387.3986.62Up is Good HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201621.7067.9830.5735.0021.70Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.7721.2119.6417.7012.77Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.9112.3010.1011.909.91Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.7011.7010.509.6011.70Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202012.2311.0411.74Up is Bad HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.8061.5463.1665.0070.80Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0975.2278.9677.8077.09Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201882.4682.7083.1083.2082.46Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.2085.3086.4088.4089.20Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202088.5588.8988.56Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.1030.5925.8221.0030.10Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.2334.0336.8735.7044.23Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.1544.5044.3042.3043.15Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.3844.6045.7048.6749.38Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202046.9245.6350.89Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201616.7718.1620.8118.0020.40Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.6523.9821.6625.0041.65Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.2165.7073.0069.0072.21Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.8078.4079.8083.8081.80Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202083.1583.8686.29Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.0022.2232.2347.0070.00Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.9268.9474.8174.5076.92Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201881.5279.4080.2081.9081.52Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201984.7078.5080.5082.4084.70Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.4984.6083.48Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.607.4510.8215.0011.60Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5522.3923.0816.1018.55Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.6446.0046.3062.1062.64Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201971.2060.8070.6069.8071.20Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202072.6171.3776.28Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201652.2057.9053.8050.5052.20Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201759.4055.2056.7054.0059.40Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201854.7356.8056.0053.8054.73Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.4056.6057.0058.7059.40Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202058.0456.6560.14Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201990.5589.0588.3390.1190.55Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.9089.3488.24Up is Good KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201634.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.00Up is Bad KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2011/201285.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2012/201387.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2013/201488.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2014/201590.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201285.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201384.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201487.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201587.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2010/201186.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2011/201286.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2012/201389.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2013/201490.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2014/201590.00Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.04Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.11Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.11Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.22Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201668.00Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.50Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201869.60Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973.60Up is Good KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2015/201632.00Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2016/201730.30Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.20Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.40Up is Bad mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121150.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013862.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141418.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015790.00287.00467.00629.00798.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016689.0055.00101.00155.00155.00219.00265.00329.00329.00388.00448.00490.00490.00589.00645.00689.00689.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20171216.0091.00183.00274.00274.00355.00421.00515.00515.00625.00776.00893.00893.001011.001117.001216.001216.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20181093.0054.00130.00241.00241.00319.00401.00517.00517.00621.00714.00788.00788.00911.001012.001093.001093.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20191101.00118.00219.00297.00297.00390.00475.00598.00598.00681.00754.00806.00806.00888.00983.001101.001101.00Neutral mipack1Number of Referrals to Children's Social Care - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202148.00167.00367.00544.00544.00724.00901.001078.001078.001243.001441.001657.001657.001848.002030.002148.002148.00Neutral mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201226.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201420.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.006.009.0012.0013.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.004.008.009.0013.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.001.003.007.007.007.008.009.009.0011.0011.0015.0015.0016.0016.0016.0016.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201812.002.002.004.004.004.004.004.004.005.0010.0010.0010.0011.0011.0012.0012.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201911.000.000.000.000.003.003.003.003.008.009.009.009.009.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad mipack2Number of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202015.003.006.009.009.009.009.0010.0010.0011.0011.0011.0011.0012.0013.0015.0015.00Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201225.00Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201322.60Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201432.25Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201520.31Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201617.8111.1117.6516.6716.6715.6321.6217.3917.3916.6716.0016.3616.3618.7518.3117.8117.81Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201719.0520.0025.0030.4330.4324.1424.2421.4321.4323.4022.0022.0622.0621.6220.5119.0519.05Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201818.7550.0025.0028.5728.5722.2219.0515.3815.3817.8622.2221.2821.2822.0020.7518.7518.75Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201915.710.000.000.000.0010.349.388.338.3318.6018.3716.9816.9815.2516.1815.7115.71Up is Bad mipack2a% of children entering care who have previously been looked after, excluding Short Breaks - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202012.7137.5035.2929.0329.0325.7116.6716.3916.3916.6715.2814.4714.4714.4612.6212.7112.71Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20116.55Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.53Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.05Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.82Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.03Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.52Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.28Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.50Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201115.26Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.36Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.35Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201514.97Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.14Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201817.41Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.10Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201785.0092.0092.0095.3094.9093.9093.9092.3086.7085.0085.00Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201881.0085.5083.9084.2084.2084.7083.6089.2089.2091.1090.6091.8091.8083.9080.7081.0081.00Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201985.9082.5080.8080.6080.6081.5081.9091.1091.1091.4092.8091.0091.0091.3089.8085.9085.90Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202085.5086.3086.8087.2087.2088.9090.9095.9095.9095.5094.7094.0094.0091.1088.1085.5085.50Up is Bad PEI8% of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.00Up is Good PEI8% of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201581.0075.0078.0081.0081.00Up is Good PEI8% of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201680.0088.0087.0089.0080.00Up is Good PEI8% of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201787.0084.00NC88.0087.00Up is Good PEI8% of registrations of vulnerable groups living in the most deprived SOA in all Children Centres - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018N/AN/AUp is Good PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200935.80Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201027.70Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201127.0027.10Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201225.3021.4027.8025.2017.60Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201322.9628.5013.4032.2019.20Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.5921.7021.4024.1017.70Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201515.7110.5020.9013.3022.00Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.4124.5018.9016.3015.20Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201714.8016.6015.1012.50Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.60Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.4021.40Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201516.5018.6018.5015.7016.50Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201618.8020.0019.6020.4018.80Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8016.8015.8014.8016.80Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201813.0014.8014.3015.6013.00Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201913.7015.8016.10Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200913.50Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.00Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201113.50Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201213.10Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.70Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.20Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.90Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201610.00Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201710.30Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad PHOF13% of children in poverty (under 16s)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.41Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.80Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.10Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.40Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.30Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.20Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.20Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20196.20Up is Bad PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.04Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.40Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201696.24Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017N/AUp is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018N/AUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.41Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201599.24Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201699.45Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017N/AUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/201899.70Up is Good PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.74Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20134.95Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.97Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.30Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.23Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.44Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011961.23Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012760.97Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013498.01Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014432.43Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015413.64Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016451.30Up is Bad PHOF23First time entrants to the youth justice system (per 100,000 population aged 10-17)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.30Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20106.50Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.30Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20123.40Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.17Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.83Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.13Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161.82Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.10Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182.50Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201199.33Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201299.53Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201395.84Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.79Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015110.89Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016103.56Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017119.10Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018129.70Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019116.60Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.45Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.40Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.60Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.60Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.20Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.70Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.90Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.40Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2010/201113.50Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201214.10Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.30Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201415.90Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.10Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.0016.9020.8021.3013.00Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.1114.8614.3514.6616.1116.11Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.1915.1515.5015.6415.6415.6515.4415.6515.6515.9015.9415.4915.4915.5115.2115.1915.19Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201913.9614.9815.2215.0015.0015.1014.8314.5814.5814.6014.2714.1914.1914.5214.5513.9613.96Up is Bad PHOF39Average strengths and difficulties score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202014.1513.9014.0313.9413.9413.9214.3114.3414.3414.2714.7914.5214.5214.0514.0214.1514.15Up is Bad PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.60Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.20Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.30Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.40Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.60Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.80Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.90Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.40Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.99Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.30Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.40Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201476.80Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.70Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201678.30Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.27Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201877.70Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Neutral PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514.00Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201622.004.006.004.008.00Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.001.001.002.004.001.000.001.002.002.001.003.006.001.003.000.004.00Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201822.002.003.001.006.002.001.001.004.002.004.002.008.001.002.001.004.00Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201921.005.002.002.009.001.000.002.003.003.002.002.007.002.000.000.002.00Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202026.004.002.004.0010.002.003.002.007.001.002.000.003.002.004.000.006.00Up is Bad RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201290.40Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201392.00Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.00Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201592.3091.60Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201694.40Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.90Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.10Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201994.20Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201293.40Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201396.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201494.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201592.1092.10Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201691.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.30Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.30Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201992.30Up is Good RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201310.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201710.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201210.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201425.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201811.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.11Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201518.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201714.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.00Up is Bad RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/201213621.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/201313742.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413914.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201614499.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/201714926.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/201814935.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/201915082.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/201212513.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312870.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413230.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613728.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/201713856.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/201813891.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913895.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/20129165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/20139165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/20149165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201611073.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/20179432.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/20189564.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/20199666.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128539.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138425.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148360.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168372.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178944.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189171.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199183.00Neutral RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201412.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201511.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201610.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201910.0011.0011.0011.0011.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201423.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201521.0021.0021.0021.0021.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.0021.0021.0021.0021.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.0021.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201920.0022.0022.0022.0022.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201428.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201534.0033.0034.0034.0034.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201633.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.0035.0035.0035.0037.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201836.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0036.0036.0036.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201935.0036.0036.0036.0036.0037.0037.0037.0037.0036.0036.0036.0036.0036.0035.0035.0035.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201565.0063.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201666.0066.0066.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.0070.0070.0070.0076.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201871.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0071.0071.0071.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201969.0071.0071.0071.0071.0073.0073.0073.0073.0071.0071.0071.0071.0071.0069.0069.0069.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.00Up is Good RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20149.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20156.006.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20166.006.006.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.003.003.003.001.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201512.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0012.0012.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.006.006.006.002.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20184.002.001.001.001.002.002.002.002.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20198.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.006.006.006.006.006.008.008.008.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.003.001.001.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.001.001.001.002.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.002.002.002.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20146.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.004.002.002.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.002.001.501.504.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.004.004.004.004.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153.003.003.003.003.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163.003.003.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.004.004.004.004.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20185.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20195.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201425.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201527.0027.0027.0027.0027.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201633.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.0044.0044.0044.0044.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201856.0044.0044.0044.0044.0044.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201956.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20147.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.007.007.007.007.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.005.005.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20173.004.004.004.003.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.003.003.003.003.003.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20203.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.003.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201564.0064.0064.0064.0064.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201656.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201733.5044.0044.0040.0033.50Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.0033.5034.0034.0034.0033.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202033.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0033.0033.0033.0033.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20151.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20190.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20200.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20159.009.009.009.009.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20190.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20200.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.001.001.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.001.001.001.002.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201722.5011.0011.0011.0022.50Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.0022.5023.0023.0023.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.000.000.000.000.000.000.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.0014.0014.0014.0014.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614.0014.0014.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201715.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201816.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0016.0016.0016.0016.0016.0016.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201915.0016.0016.0016.0016.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201423.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201522.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201622.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201724.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201825.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0025.0025.0025.0025.0025.0025.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201924.0025.0025.0025.0025.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201435.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201541.0040.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201640.0040.0040.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201743.0042.0042.0042.0043.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201841.0043.0043.0043.0043.0043.0042.0042.0042.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201940.0041.0041.0041.0041.0042.0042.0042.0042.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.0040.0040.0040.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202041.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201565.0063.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.0063.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201769.0067.0067.0067.0069.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.0069.0068.0068.0068.0068.0067.0067.0067.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201963.0065.0065.0065.0065.0067.0067.0067.0067.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.0063.0063.0063.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202065.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201411.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.007.007.007.007.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20166.006.006.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.003.003.003.001.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201511.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201610.0010.0010.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.505.005.005.001.50Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20183.001.502.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.005.005.005.005.005.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.008.008.008.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.002.001.001.000.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.001.001.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.002.002.002.004.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181.004.004.004.004.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.003.003.003.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20145.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.003.002.002.000.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20162.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20175.503.003.003.005.50Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.005.506.006.006.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.000.000.000.000.000.000.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20203.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.005.005.005.003.003.003.00Up is Bad SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.70Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.75Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148.60Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.70Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.30Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20176.20Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.40Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20197.60Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.04Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201280.40Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201376.30Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201476.30Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201578.00Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201678.20Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201778.04Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.10Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Neutral TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201780.7579.60NC80.75NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201879.7079.20NC79.70NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201977.7881.68NC77.78NCUp is Good TAP10a% of panel agree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202075.4376.39NC75.43NCUp is Good TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.965.90NC4.96NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20184.496.64NC4.49NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.416.74NC7.41NCUp is Bad TAP10b% of panel disagree their local area is a good place for children and young people to grow upQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209.688.62NC9.68NCUp is Bad TF2-A01iNumber of Troubled Families On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017474.00266.00325.00356.00474.00Up is Good TF2-A01iNumber of Troubled Families On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018618.00488.00521.00548.00618.00Up is Good TF2-A01iNumber of Troubled Families On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019804.00651.00692.00746.00804.00Up is Good TF2-A01iNumber of Troubled Families On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201054.00880.00969.001013.001054.00Up is Good