102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201224.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201420.00Up is Bad 102a%pt gap in achievement of Level 4+ Reading, Writing & Maths at Key Stage 2 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201332.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.00Up is Bad 102b%pt gap in achievement of 5+A*-Cs GCSE (or equivalent) including English & Maths at Key Stage 4 between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.00Up is Bad 117% of Year 12-14 (Academic age 16-18) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20135.10Up is Bad 117% of Year 12-14 (Academic age 16-18) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20144.505.605.606.205.806.406.906.906.704.604.204.304.404.204.404.804.50Up is Bad 117% of Year 12-14 (Academic age 16-18) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20154.704.905.105.405.105.806.104.905.604.304.404.704.505.004.804.704.70Up is Bad 117% of Year 12-14 (Academic age 16-18) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20165.204.604.604.604.605.105.304.805.104.804.904.804.805.205.205.105.20Up is Bad 117% of Year 12-14 (Academic age 16-18) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20175.105.205.105.105.405.40Up is Bad 117c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20173.302.502.502.402.702.702.702.903.103.303.30Up is Bad 117c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182.903.503.303.203.203.503.601.901.902.302.402.502.502.702.502.902.90Up is Bad 117c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192.703.002.903.003.003.103.401.601.601.702.002.302.302.302.602.702.70Up is Bad 117c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) young people who are not in education, employment or training (NEET) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202.402.802.702.502.502.402.602.202.201.902.202.402.402.302.402.402.40Up is Bad 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201162.10Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201263.00Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201367.00Up is Good 75% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (old Best Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.00Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201462.30Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.70Up is Good 75a% of pupils achieving 5+ A*-Cs GCSE inc. English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (new First Entry definition) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.20Up is Good 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201135.2035.20Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.5033.50Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.7039.70Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201435.3035.30Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201541.7041.70Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201632.0032.00Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201733.9033.90Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201840.3040.30Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad 81%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 3 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.9036.90Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201231.6031.60Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.3023.30Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201417.1017.10Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.2019.20Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.2014.20Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201725.1025.10Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.3031.30Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad 82%pt gap between FSM and non-FSM pupils at 15, who attain a Level 2 qualification by the age of 19 - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad 87aSecondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127.107.10Up is Bad 87aSecondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.106.10Up is Bad 87aSecondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.005.00Up is Bad 87aSecondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.705.70Up is Bad 87aSecondary school persistent absence rate (15% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCNCUp is Bad 87aaSecondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.4012.40Up is Bad 87aaSecondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.9012.90Up is Bad 87aaSecondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.5015.50Up is Bad 87aaSecondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201913.18Up is Bad 87aaSecondary school persistent absence rate (10% absence) (recorded over 6 terms)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20098.008.00Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20108.008.00Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.207.20Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20127.007.007.00Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.506.506.50Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.906.906.90Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.904.904.90Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.604.604.60Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20176.206.206.20Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.404.404.40Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20195.505.505.50Up is Bad CJGE17% of working age population qualified - No qualificationsAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2008/200975.5075.50Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2009/201077.8077.80Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177.7077.70Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.9076.9076.90Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.8079.8079.80Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.3080.3080.30Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2014/201582.5082.5082.50Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2015/201681.1081.1081.10Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.2080.2080.20Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2017/201885.0085.0085.00Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.2083.2083.20Up is Good CJGE18% of working age population qualified - to at least L2 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2008/200961.5061.50Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2009/201064.0064.00Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2010/201164.9064.90Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2011/201260.4060.4060.40Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.7063.7063.70Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.2064.2064.20Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2014/201566.8066.8066.80Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.8065.8065.80Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.2065.2065.20Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2017/201871.6071.6071.60Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2018/201969.8069.8069.80Up is Good CJGE19% of working age population qualified - to at least L3 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2008/200936.0036.00Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2009/201040.8040.80Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2010/201140.0040.00Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2011/201240.6040.6040.60Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2012/201341.2041.2041.20Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2013/201440.2040.2040.20Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2014/201540.3040.3040.30Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2015/201640.6040.6040.60Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2016/201742.7042.7042.70Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2017/201848.9048.9048.90Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2018/201947.9047.9047.90Up is Good CJGE20% of working age population qualified - to at least L4 and above*AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.49Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.50Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201570.00Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201674.10Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.30Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201874.80Up is Good EH7% of children who have achieved a Good Level of Development (GLD) at Foundation Stage - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.60Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201265.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201366.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201484.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201584.0084.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201889.0087.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019100.00Up is Good ES8% of After School Clubs achieving 'good' or 'outstanding' - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020100.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201478.0078.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201570.0070.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201672.0072.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.50Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201878.0074.00Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973.50Up is Good ES9% Take up of early education places by eligible two year olds - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202075.50Up is Good KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201634.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.00Up is Bad KS2b%pt gap in achievement between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers - Key Stage 2 Reading, Writing & Maths (aged 10-11)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.00Up is Bad KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2011/201285.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2012/201387.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2013/201488.00Up is Good KS2E% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ EnglishAnnualFinancial Year2014/201590.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201285.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201384.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201487.00Up is Good KS2M% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ MathsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201587.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2010/201186.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2011/201286.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2012/201389.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2013/201490.00Up is Good KS2S% of pupils achieving Key Stage 2 Level 4+ ScienceAnnualFinancial Year2014/201590.00Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.04Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.11Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.11Up is Good KS4aAverage Progress 8 score from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.22Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201668.00Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.50Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201869.60Up is Good KS4c% of pupils achieving 9-4 or above in English & Maths at Key Stage 4 (C or above before 2016/17)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973.60Up is Good KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2015/201632.00Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2016/201730.30Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.20Up is Bad KS4i%pt gap between disadvantaged pupils (eligible for FSM in the last 6 years, children in care and adopted from care) and their peers achieving 9-4 in English & Maths at Key Stage 4AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.40Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201785.0092.0092.0095.3094.9093.9093.9092.3086.7085.0085.00Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201881.0085.5083.9084.2084.2084.7083.6089.2089.2091.1090.6091.8091.8083.9080.7081.0081.00Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201985.9082.5080.8080.6080.6081.5081.9091.1091.1091.4092.8091.0091.0091.3089.8085.9085.90Up is Bad NEET02c% of Year 12-13 (academic age 16-17) NEET who possess less than a L2 qualification (New definition Jan 2017) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202085.5086.3086.8087.2087.2088.9090.9095.9095.9095.5094.7094.0094.0091.1088.1085.5085.50Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.74Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20134.95Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.97Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.30Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.23Up is Bad PHOF22% of half days missed by pupils due to overall absence (including authorised and unauthorised absence)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.44Up is Bad PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.60Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.20Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.30Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.40Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.60Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.80Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.90Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.40Neutral PriFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.99Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.30Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.40Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201476.80Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.70Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201678.30Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.27Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201877.70Neutral PriFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the primary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Neutral RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012660.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013508.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014554.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015546.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016462.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017617.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018734.00Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019Up is Bad RM16Number of fixed term exclusions in the secondary sectorAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Up is Bad RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201290.40Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201392.00Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.00Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201592.3091.60Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201694.40Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.90Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.10Up is Good RM20% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Primary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201994.20Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201293.40Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201396.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201494.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201592.1092.10Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201691.00Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.30Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.30Up is Good RM21% of 1st preferences secured for York children in the Secondary school admission round (relates to academic year after financial year shown) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201992.30Up is Good RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201310.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201710.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.00Up is Bad RM3% of primary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201210.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201425.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.00Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201811.11Up is Bad RM4% of secondary schools with 25% or more of their places unfilled - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.11Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201518.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201714.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.00Up is Bad RM5% of primary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.00Up is Bad RM6% of secondary schools oversubscribed by 5% or more in years 7-11 (@ January school census) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.00Up is Bad RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/201213621.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/201313742.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413914.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201614499.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/201714926.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/201814935.00Neutral RM70Number of primary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/201915082.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/201212513.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312870.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413230.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613728.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/201713856.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/201813891.00Neutral RM71Projected number of primary school aged-pupils in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913895.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2011/20129165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2012/20139165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2013/20149165.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2015/201611073.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2016/20179432.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2017/20189564.00Neutral RM72Number of secondary school places in YorkAnnualFinancial Year2018/20199666.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128539.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138425.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148360.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168372.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178944.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189171.00Neutral RM73Projected number of secondary school aged-pupils in York (11-16)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199183.00Neutral RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201412.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201511.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201610.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201910.0011.0011.0011.0011.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM74School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201423.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201521.0021.0021.0021.0021.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.0021.0021.0021.0021.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.0021.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201920.0022.0022.0022.0022.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM75School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.0020.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201428.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201534.0033.0034.0034.0034.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201633.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.0035.0035.0035.0037.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201836.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0037.0036.0036.0036.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201935.0036.0036.0036.0036.0037.0037.0037.0037.0036.0036.0036.0036.0036.0035.0035.0035.00Up is Good RM76School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.0035.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201565.0063.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201666.0066.0066.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.0070.0070.0070.0076.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201871.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0073.0071.0071.0071.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201969.0071.0071.0071.0071.0073.0073.0073.0073.0071.0071.0071.0071.0071.0069.0069.0069.00Up is Good RM77School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.0069.00Up is Good RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20149.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20156.006.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20166.006.006.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.003.003.003.001.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM78School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201512.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0012.0012.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.006.006.006.002.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20184.002.001.001.001.002.002.002.002.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20198.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.006.006.006.006.006.008.008.008.00Up is Bad RM79School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.008.0010.0010.0010.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.003.001.001.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.001.001.001.002.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.002.002.002.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM80School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20146.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.004.002.002.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.002.001.501.504.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.004.004.004.004.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM81School Ofsted Rating - Primary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153.003.003.003.003.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163.003.003.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.004.004.004.004.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20185.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20195.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM82School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.005.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201425.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201527.0027.0027.0027.0027.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201633.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.0044.0044.0044.0044.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201856.0044.0044.0044.0044.0044.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201956.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM83School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20147.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.007.007.007.007.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.005.005.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20173.004.004.004.003.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.003.003.003.003.003.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Good RM84School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20203.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.003.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201564.0064.0064.0064.0064.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201656.0056.0056.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201733.5044.0044.0040.0033.50Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.0033.5034.0034.0034.0033.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM85School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202033.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0033.0033.0033.0033.0033.0033.00Up is Good RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20151.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20190.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM86School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20200.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20159.009.009.009.009.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20190.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM87School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20200.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.001.001.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.001.001.001.002.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.000.000.000.000.000.000.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM88School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20140.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.000.000.000.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201722.5011.0011.0011.0022.50Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.0022.5023.0023.0023.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.000.000.000.000.000.000.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Bad RM89School Ofsted Rating - Secondary: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0022.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.0014.0014.0014.0014.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614.0014.0014.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201715.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201816.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0016.0016.0016.0016.0016.0016.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201915.0016.0016.0016.0016.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM90School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.0015.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201423.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201522.0022.0022.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201622.0022.0022.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201724.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201825.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0025.0025.0025.0025.0025.0025.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201924.0025.0025.0025.0025.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM91School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Outstanding -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.0024.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201435.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201541.0040.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201640.0040.0040.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201743.0042.0042.0042.0043.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201841.0043.0043.0043.0043.0043.0042.0042.0042.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201940.0041.0041.0041.0041.0042.0042.0042.0042.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.0040.0040.0040.00Up is Good RM92School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202041.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0040.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.0041.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201565.0063.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.0063.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201769.0067.0067.0067.0069.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.0069.0068.0068.0068.0068.0067.0067.0067.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201963.0065.0065.0065.0065.0067.0067.0067.0067.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.0063.0063.0063.00Up is Good RM93School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Good -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202065.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0063.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.0065.00Up is Good RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201411.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.007.007.007.007.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20166.006.006.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.003.003.003.001.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.003.003.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM94School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.005.005.005.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201511.0011.0011.0011.0011.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201610.0010.0010.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20171.505.005.005.001.50Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20183.001.502.002.002.002.002.002.002.003.003.003.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.003.005.005.005.005.005.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM95School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Requires improvement -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.008.008.008.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20143.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.002.001.001.000.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.001.001.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.002.002.002.004.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181.004.004.004.004.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.000.000.000.000.000.000.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.00Up is Bad RM96School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate - numbersQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.004.003.003.003.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20145.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.003.002.002.000.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20162.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20175.503.003.003.005.50Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.005.506.006.006.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.000.000.000.000.000.000.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.00Up is Bad RM97School Ofsted Rating - Overall: Inadequate -%QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20203.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.006.005.005.005.003.003.003.00Up is Bad RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014N/AUp is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015N/AUp is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201691.20Up is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201791.2091.2092.8094.7091.20Up is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201897.4091.6092.0092.0092.0095.0098.6098.6098.6098.6097.4097.40Up is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201986.6097.0097.0097.0097.0097.0097.0097.0097.0095.0095.0095.0095.0089.3089.3088.6086.60Up is Good RM98% of pupils attending good or outstanding schools - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202091.0089.0089.0089.0089.0089.0089.0089.0089.0089.0091.0091.0091.0091.0091.0091.00Up is Good SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.70Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.75Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20148.60Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.70Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.30Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20176.20Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.40Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20197.60Neutral SecFSM% of children who are eligible for a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.04Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201280.40Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201376.30Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201476.30Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201578.00Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201678.20Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201778.04Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.10Neutral SecFSMa% of eligible children taking a free school meal in the secondary sector (excluding Danesgate) - (Snapshot)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020Neutral