_id Id Indicator CollectionFrequency YearType Year Total Apr May Jun Q1 Jul Aug Sep Q2 Oct Nov Dec Q3 Jan Feb Mar Q4 Polarity 1 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 0.00 Neutral 2 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Neutral 3 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 0.05 Neutral 4 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 0.05 Neutral 5 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 0.05 Neutral 6 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 0.05 Neutral 7 APSE073 Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18) Annual Financial Year 2019/2020 Neutral 8 BSC03 % of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local community Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Neutral 9 BSC03 % of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local community Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 70.00 Neutral 10 BSC03 % of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local community Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 74.00 Neutral 11 BSC03 % of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local community Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Neutral 12 BSC03 % of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local community Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Neutral 13 BSC04 % of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local area Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 14 BSC04 % of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local area Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 75.00 Up is Good 15 BSC04 % of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local area Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 86.00 Up is Good 16 BSC04 % of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local area Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 17 BSC04 % of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local area Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 18 BYS001 % of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 19 BYS001 % of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 29.00 Up is Good 20 BYS001 % of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 24.00 Up is Good 21 BYS001 % of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 22 BYS001 % of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 23 BYS053 % of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 24 BYS053 % of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 91.00 Up is Good 25 BYS053 % of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 83.00 Up is Good 26 BYS053 % of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 27 BYS053 % of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 28 BYS079 % of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 29 BYS079 % of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 55.00 Up is Good 30 BYS079 % of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 54.00 Up is Good 31 BYS079 % of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 32 BYS079 % of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 33 BYS105 % of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 34 BYS105 % of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 73.00 Up is Good 35 BYS105 % of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 58.00 Up is Good 36 BYS105 % of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 37 BYS105 % of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 38 BYS131 % of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 39 BYS131 % of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 74.00 Up is Good 40 BYS131 % of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 80.00 Up is Good 41 BYS131 % of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 42 BYS131 % of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 43 BYS254 % of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 44 BYS254 % of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 26.00 Up is Good 45 BYS254 % of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 33.00 Up is Good 46 BYS254 % of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 47 BYS254 % of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 48 BYS300 % of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 49 BYS300 % of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 79.00 Up is Good 50 BYS300 % of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 79.00 Up is Good 51 BYS300 % of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 52 BYS300 % of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 53 BYS301 % of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviour Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 54 BYS301 % of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviour Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 56.00 Up is Good 55 BYS301 % of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviour Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 48.00 Up is Good 56 BYS301 % of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviour Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 57 BYS301 % of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviour Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 58 BYS302 % of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities safer Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 N/A Up is Good 59 BYS302 % of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities safer Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 54.00 Up is Good 60 BYS302 % of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities safer Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 45.00 Up is Good 61 BYS302 % of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities safer Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 62 BYS302 % of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities safer Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 63 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2008/2009 8.62 Up is Bad 64 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2009/2010 7.42 Up is Bad 65 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2010/2011 7.93 Up is Bad 66 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 7.99 Up is Bad 67 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 7.88 Up is Bad 68 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 7.97 Up is Bad 69 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 8.18 Up is Bad 70 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 8.64 Up is Bad 71 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 8.90 Up is Bad 72 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 9.09 Up is Bad 73 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 9.29 Up is Bad 74 CJGE172 Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio) Annual Financial Year 2019/2020 8.85 Up is Bad 75 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 45.80 Up is Good 76 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 42.70 Up is Good 77 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 43.00 Up is Good 78 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 46.60 Up is Good 79 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 45.80 Up is Good 80 PHOF15 % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 49.50 Up is Good 81 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 1.11 Up is Bad 82 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 1.11 Up is Bad 83 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 0.94 Up is Bad 84 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 0.76 Up is Bad 85 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 0.65 Up is Bad 86 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 0.70 Up is Bad 87 PHOF26 Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households) Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 0.50 Up is Bad 88 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 187.19 Up is Bad 89 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 189.91 Up is Bad 90 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 490.77 Up is Bad 91 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 176.11 Up is Bad 92 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 169.27 Up is Bad 93 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 162.85 Up is Bad 94 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 168.90 Up is Bad 95 PHOF46 Mortality rate from causes considered preventable (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 175.00 Up is Bad 96 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 119.32 Up is Bad 97 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 114.10 Up is Bad 98 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 115.70 Up is Bad 99 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 102.10 Up is Bad 100 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 98.50 Up is Bad 101 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 93.30 Up is Bad 102 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 94.70 Up is Bad 103 PHOF50 Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 96.30 Up is Bad 104 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 160.09 Up is Bad 105 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 163.67 Up is Bad 106 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 171.06 Up is Bad 107 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 163.27 Up is Bad 108 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 154.45 Up is Bad 109 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 145.79 Up is Bad 110 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 148.30 Up is Bad 111 PHOF56 Under 75 mortality rate from cancer (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 143.30 Up is Bad 112 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 15.35 Up is Bad 113 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 16.71 Up is Bad 114 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 16.16 Up is Bad 115 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 16.45 Up is Bad 116 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 18.51 Up is Bad 117 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 20.28 Up is Bad 118 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 23.30 Up is Bad 119 PHOF62 Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 21.00 Up is Bad 120 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 37.82 Up is Bad 121 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 36.12 Up is Bad 122 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 38.30 Up is Bad 123 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 36.24 Up is Bad 124 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 32.98 Up is Bad 125 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 30.76 Up is Bad 126 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 32.00 Up is Bad 127 PHOF67 Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - Male Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 38.30 Up is Bad 128 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2011/2012 70.91 Up is Bad 129 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2012/2013 64.75 Up is Bad 130 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 60.81 Up is Bad 131 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 54.49 Up is Bad 132 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 6.98 Up is Bad 133 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 7.90 Up is Bad 134 PHOF72 Mortality from communicable diseases (per 100,000 population) Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 10.00 Up is Bad 135 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2013/2014 2623.00 Up is Bad 136 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2014/2015 2680.00 Up is Bad 137 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2015/2016 2717.00 Up is Bad 138 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2016/2017 2788.00 Up is Bad 139 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2017/2018 2788.00 Up is Bad 140 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2018/2019 2779.00 Up is Bad 141 POPPI01 Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementia Annual Financial Year 2019/2020 2834.00 Up is Bad 142 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2011/2012 100.00 Up is Good 143 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2012/2013 100.00 Up is Good 144 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2013/2014 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Up is Good 145 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2014/2015 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Up is Good 146 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 147 PP11 % certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receipt Monthly Financial Year 2016/2017 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Up is Good 148 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 91.00 Up is Good 149 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 83.00 Up is Good 150 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 151 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 152 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 89.84 91.90 NC 89.84 NC Up is Good 153 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 89.94 91.23 NC 89.94 NC Up is Good 154 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 88.61 88.09 NC 88.61 NC Up is Good 155 TAP01a % of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 84.47 88.45 NC 84.47 NC Up is Good 156 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 4.00 Up is Bad 157 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 10.00 Up is Bad 158 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 159 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 160 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 6.18 5.60 NC 6.18 NC Up is Bad 161 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 6.29 6.80 NC 6.29 NC Up is Bad 162 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 8.02 7.80 NC 8.02 NC Up is Bad 163 TAP01b % of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 10.12 8.81 NC 10.12 NC Up is Bad 164 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 63.00 Up is Good 165 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 54.00 Up is Good 166 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 167 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 168 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 65.54 65.60 NC 65.54 NC Up is Good 169 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 62.13 64.76 NC 62.13 NC Up is Good 170 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 57.33 60.29 NC 57.33 NC Up is Good 171 TAP02a % of panel satisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 51.00 55.56 NC 51.00 NC Up is Good 172 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 19.00 Up is Bad 173 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 29.00 Up is Bad 174 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 175 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 176 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 20.32 20.80 NC 20.32 NC Up is Bad 177 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 22.80 20.26 NC 22.80 NC Up is Bad 178 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 22.10 23.05 NC 22.10 NC Up is Bad 179 TAP02b % of panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs things Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 19.65 21.62 NC 19.65 NC Up is Bad 180 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 45.00 Up is Good 181 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 42.00 Up is Good 182 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 183 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 184 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 45.33 47.20 NC 45.33 NC Up is Good 185 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 45.45 48.57 NC 45.45 NC Up is Good 186 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 43.14 42.68 NC 43.14 NC Up is Good 187 TAP03a % of panel agree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 38.07 43.00 NC 38.07 NC Up is Good 188 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 25.00 Up is Bad 189 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 31.00 Up is Bad 190 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 191 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 192 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 24.06 22.20 NC 24.06 NC Up is Bad 193 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 23.89 21.10 NC 23.89 NC Up is Bad 194 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 17.21 23.51 NC 17.21 NC Up is Bad 195 TAP03b % of panel disagree the council provides value for money Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 19.76 19.00 NC 19.76 NC Up is Bad 196 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 92.00 Up is Good 197 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 89.00 Up is Good 198 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 199 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 200 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 92.20 91.90 NC 92.20 NC Up is Good 201 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 91.70 92.65 NC 91.70 NC Up is Good 202 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 89.63 91.51 NC 89.63 NC Up is Good 203 TAP04a % of panel satisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 87.53 87.07 NC 87.53 NC Up is Good 204 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 4.00 Up is Bad 205 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 6.00 Up is Bad 206 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 207 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 208 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 4.40 3.10 NC 4.40 NC Up is Bad 209 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 5.53 4.01 NC 5.53 NC Up is Bad 210 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 6.70 4.46 NC 6.70 NC Up is Bad 211 TAP04b % of panel dissatisfied with York as a place to live Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 5.87 8.28 NC 5.87 NC Up is Bad 212 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 NC Up is Good 213 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 40.00 Up is Good 214 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 215 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 216 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 60.81 61.70 NC 60.81 NC Up is Good 217 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 50.33 62.81 NC 50.33 NC Up is Good 218 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 51.31 50.64 NC 51.31 NC Up is Good 219 TAP05a % of panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 51.50 53.29 NC 51.50 NC Up is Good 220 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 NC Up is Bad 221 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 11.00 Up is Bad 222 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 223 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 224 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 7.47 7.00 NC 7.47 NC Up is Bad 225 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 10.68 7.35 NC 10.68 NC Up is Bad 226 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 7.21 10.04 NC 7.21 NC Up is Bad 227 TAP05b % of panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 months Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 8.25 8.03 NC 8.25 NC Up is Bad 228 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 70.00 Up is Good 229 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 74.00 Up is Good 230 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 231 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 232 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 89.20 88.80 NC 89.20 NC Up is Good 233 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 86.05 89.53 NC 86.05 NC Up is Good 234 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 91.92 88.61 NC 91.92 NC Up is Good 235 TAP06a % of panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 87.94 88.73 NC 87.94 NC Up is Good 236 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 30.00 Up is Bad 237 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 26.00 Up is Bad 238 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 239 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 240 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 10.40 10.80 NC 10.40 NC Up is Bad 241 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 13.09 9.58 NC 13.09 NC Up is Bad 242 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 7.21 9.92 NC 7.21 NC Up is Bad 243 TAP06b % of panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 11.56 10.45 NC 11.56 NC Up is Bad 244 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 55.00 Up is Good 245 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 54.00 Up is Good 246 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 247 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 248 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 74.70 75.20 NC 74.70 NC Up is Good 249 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 75.27 78.44 NC 75.27 NC Up is Good 250 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 80.22 76.41 NC 80.22 NC Up is Good 251 TAP07a % of panel who agree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 77.78 78.06 NC 77.78 NC Up is Good 252 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 45.00 Up is Bad 253 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 46.00 Up is Bad 254 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 255 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 256 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 25.10 24.40 NC 25.10 NC Up is Bad 257 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 23.03 19.11 NC 23.03 NC Up is Bad 258 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 19.33 21.71 NC 19.33 NC Up is Bad 259 TAP07b % of panel who disagree that they belong to their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 21.71 20.46 NC 21.71 NC Up is Bad 260 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 73.00 Up is Good 261 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 58.00 Up is Good 262 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 263 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 264 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 70.11 69.50 NC 70.11 NC Up is Good 265 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 72.84 75.24 NC 72.84 NC Up is Good 266 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 68.47 75.06 NC 68.47 NC Up is Good 267 TAP08a % of panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 61.88 62.17 NC 61.88 NC Up is Good 268 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 8.00 Up is Bad 269 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 15.00 Up is Bad 270 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 271 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 272 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 9.44 9.40 NC 9.44 NC Up is Bad 273 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 11.85 6.55 NC 11.85 NC Up is Bad 274 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 6.91 8.86 NC 6.91 NC Up is Bad 275 TAP08b % of panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 8.91 9.20 NC 8.91 NC Up is Bad 276 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 29.00 Up is Good 277 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 24.00 Up is Good 278 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 279 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 280 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 25.65 29.00 NC 25.65 NC Up is Good 281 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 26.87 28.41 NC 26.87 NC Up is Good 282 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 28.95 25.68 NC 28.95 NC Up is Good 283 TAP11a % of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 29.06 27.37 NC 29.06 NC Up is Good 284 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 42.00 Up is Bad 285 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 49.00 Up is Bad 286 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 287 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 288 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 39.96 39.50 NC 39.96 NC Up is Bad 289 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 40.94 37.22 NC 40.94 NC Up is Bad 290 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 41.01 43.16 NC 41.01 NC Up is Bad 291 TAP11b % of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 37.93 39.30 NC 37.93 NC Up is Bad 292 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 75.00 Up is Good 293 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 86.00 Up is Good 294 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 295 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 296 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 90.85 88.20 NC 90.85 NC Up is Good 297 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 89.91 90.27 NC 89.91 NC Up is Good 298 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 92.24 89.66 NC 92.24 NC Up is Good 299 TAP12a % of panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 90.59 91.58 NC 90.59 NC Up is Good 300 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 25.00 Up is Bad 301 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 14.00 Up is Bad 302 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 303 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 304 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 7.36 10.50 NC 7.36 NC Up is Bad 305 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 8.37 7.74 NC 8.37 NC Up is Bad 306 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 6.21 8.02 NC 6.21 NC Up is Bad 307 TAP12b % of panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local area Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 8.17 6.74 NC 8.17 NC Up is Bad 308 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 74.00 Up is Good 309 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 80.00 Up is Good 310 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Good 311 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Good 312 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 77.03 77.00 NC 77.03 NC Up is Good 313 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 70.51 74.72 NC 70.51 NC Up is Good 314 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 77.19 73.21 NC 77.19 NC Up is Good 315 TAP20a % of panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 79.75 73.35 NC 79.75 NC Up is Good 316 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2012/2013 11.00 Up is Bad 317 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2013/2014 10.00 Up is Bad 318 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 NC Up is Bad 319 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 NC Up is Bad 320 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 12.80 11.50 NC 12.80 NC Up is Bad 321 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 17.52 14.41 NC 17.52 NC Up is Bad 322 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 10.31 14.14 NC 10.31 NC Up is Bad 323 TAP20b % of panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 10.00 12.60 NC 10.00 NC Up is Bad 324 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 52.00 52.00 Up is Good 325 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 500.00 299.00 349.00 377.00 500.00 Up is Good 326 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 742.00 547.00 581.00 617.00 742.00 Up is Good 327 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 891.00 761.00 786.00 815.00 891.00 Up is Good 328 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 1078.00 934.00 965.00 1025.00 1078.00 Up is Good 329 TF2-A01 Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 1328.00 1155.00 1242.00 1287.00 1328.00 Up is Good 330 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2014/2015 0.00 0.00 Up is Good 331 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2015/2016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Up is Good 332 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2016/2017 6.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 6.00 Up is Good 333 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2017/2018 10.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 10.00 Up is Good 334 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2018/2019 20.00 10.00 14.00 15.00 20.00 Up is Good 335 TF2-A02 % of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot) Quarterly Financial Year 2019/2020 31.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 31.00 Up is Good